Legal Opinion

Holland Furnace Co. v. Trumbull Savings & Loan Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1939No. 27084PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHast, J.

The sole question involved in this case is whether a warm-air furnace installed by slight physical attachment in the basement of a previously mortgaged dwelling house, without the knowledge or consent of the mortgagee, which heater or furnace replaced a worn out and worthless one under a conditional sales contract between the owner of the dwelling house and a furnace company supplying the furnace, whereby it is to retain a personal property status and title is to remain in the furnace company until final payment is made therefor, becomes a fixture and passes with a deed for the dwelling house…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lessee of Paine v. MoorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Masheter v. BoehmOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Zangerle v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Zangerle v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Perez Bar & Grill v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Kerman v. SwaffordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API