Legal Opinion

CR by Dunn v. the Travelers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1993No. 2043PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this Opinion, we are called upon to determine whether, on the basis of a petition for contempt, a trial court may, without hearing, direct the appellant, the Travelers, to submit another settlement draft to the court-appointed guardian of the estate of the appellee-minor, C.R., by finding that the appellant had acted negligently when it forwarded an earlier settlement draft to the appellee-minor’s mother and guardian, H. R., who allegedly misappropriated the funds, instead of to the appellee-minor’s counsel. We reverse.

The relevant facts and procedural history of this case are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Knaus v. KnausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. In Re Adoption of JJSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Janet D. v. CarrosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Gemini Equipment Co. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Universal Premium Acceptance Corporation v. The York Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Flynn v. Casa Di Bertacchi Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Refuse Management Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Recycling & Transfer Systems Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Scobell Inc. v. SchadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Marian Shop, Inc. v. BairdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API