Legal Opinion

Fagan v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1929No. Appeal, 133PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff in an action of trespass for false arrest. The assignments, necessary to be considered, complain of the refusal to give binding instructions for the defendant and the failure to enter judgment n. o. v.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as it must be on this appeal, establishes the following facts: A strike was in progress at the Cover-dale mine of the Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Company, defendant. To secure employees, those willing to work were collected at the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Finfrock v. Northern Central Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Tufshinsky v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Naugle v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Bunting v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Keidel v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Renk v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Russoli v. Salisbury TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Howard v. Zaney BarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Krowka v. Colt Patent Fire Arm Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Pahle v. Colebrookdale TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API