Harrison v. Crume

- Opinion: by

LOGSDON, 'C.

Numerous as-' signments of error are contained in tbe petition, in error, but they are all embraced and argued under the single proposition that 'the decree of the trial court is contrary to the law and the evidence.

It appears from an examination of the testimony preserved in the record, that the land in controversy was a portion of the allotment of Bache] Stidham, deceased, who left five heirs. These five heirs took an undivided interest in the 40 acres, Alice Flint, bee Sells, being one of the heirs and the plaintiff, Harry Harrison, being another. After the death…