Legal Opinion

Alcorn v. Rochester Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 19, 1974No. 6889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The key issue in this case is whether the trial court abused its discretion in finding that the Rochester Zoning Board of Adjustment denied the plaintiffs’ request for a variance on the merits and not for lack of jurisdiction. The plaintiffs filed an appeal from the defendant board’s denial of its petition. After a hearing before Mullavey, J., the appeal was denied. All questions of law raised by these proceedings were reserved and transferred by the court. The basic facts are not in dispute. The plaintiffs submitted an application to the Rochester building inspector for a building permit to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vannah v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  2. Gougeon v. BOROUGH OF STONE HARBORSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. Gelinas v. PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
  4. Wentworth Hotel, Inc. v. Town of New CastleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Levesque v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fields v. Kodiak City CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pappas v. City of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Ingersoll v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API