Legal Opinion

Gelinas v. Portsmouth

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 2, 1952No. 4075PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The board of adjustment of the city of Portsmouth has granted a variance upon appeal to it from an adverse decision by the building inspector and the Superior Court has dismissed the appeal from the board’s decision. The matter being properly before us (Stone v. Cray, 89 N. H. 483, 486, 487; Sullivan v. Trust Company, 89 N. H. 112) the basic question is whether the Court erred as a matter of law in so doing. We do not believe that it did for it seems to us that reasonable men upon the evidence here could have reached the same conclusion as did the Trial Court. Fortuna v. Manchester, 95 N. H.…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Carter v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  2. Pappas v. City of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Ouimette v. City of Somersworth & Agway Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. City of Punta Gorda v. MorningstarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  5. Grey Rocks Land Trust v. Town of HebronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API