Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. Williams

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 10, 1978No. 7921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The plaintiff, police chief of Bristol, seeks equitable relief to overturn his dismissal without a hearing by the defendants, the selectmen of Bristol. The town of Bristol appoints, rather than elects, its chiefs. Plaintiff’s employment was terminated on September 26, 1977, “for cause, namely, poor, inefficient and unprofessional management . . . and conduct detrimental to the good order, reputation and morale of the Department.” The plaintiff claims that RSA 41:48 prevents his discharge without a full hearing as governed by RSA ch. 43. Admittedly, those procedures were not followed.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
  5. Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests v. Site Evaluation CommitteeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Board of Selectmen v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Perron v. City of SomersworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Foster v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Yoder v. Town of MiddletonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. In re ReganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API