Legal Opinion

Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 19, 2007No. 2006-381PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The plaintiffs, Charles and Brenda Kalil, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Vaughan, J.) remanding this matter to the defendant, the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) for the Town of Dummer (Town). We affirm in part and remand.

I. Background

The following facts appear in the record. The plaintiffs own a parcel of land situated in both the Town’s conservation and conservation overlay-zones. On November 3, 2004, they filed applications with the Town’s selectmen for building permits to construct a barn, a bird barn with flying pen, and a farmhouse. The selectmen denied the applications, ruling…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Town of WarnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. Chester Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Pappas v. City of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Duffy v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. Thomas v. Town of HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Guy v. Town of TempleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. David F. Dietz & a. v. Town of TuftonboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  3. Daniels v. Town of LondonderrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. 1808 Corp. v. Town of New IpswichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API