Hutchinson v. Sperry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Thomas A. Sperry, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 28th day df March, 1913, dissolving a partnership and appointing a referee to take and state an account of the partnership property.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
In January, 1897, plaintiff and defendant with one Jackson organized the copartnership of Sperry & Hutchinson, for the purpose of carrying on the trading stamp business. Jackson afterwards dropped out, leaving only plaintiff and defendant in the firm. The partnership agreement was oral and was to continue at will, no time being set for its termination. The firm began business at once and extended it to a number of States. In November, 1897, plaintiff and defendant, together with William M. Sperry, a brother of defendant, R. J. Alexander and A. E. Wiedenbach organized a corporation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Calhoun v. . MillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Spears v. . WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People ex rel. Madden v. DyckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- M. & C. Creditors Corp. v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Smith v. MaineNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- Bankers Trust Co. v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Silberfeld v. Swiss Bank Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1944
- Cracco v. CraccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.