Legal Opinion

City of Dothan v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1939No. 4 Div. 66PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Action against municipality under the Homicide Act. The death of plaintiff’s intestate is alleged to have resulted from the negligence of appellant in operating a public utility, an electric light and power plant. This is the second appeal. For former decision, see Hardy v. City of Dothan, 234 Ala. 664, 176 So. 449.

Admittedly, J. L. Hardy, plaintiff’s intestate, came to his death from contact with wires charged with electric energy of 2,300 volts. Three wires were strung low over the roof of a gin shed, entering the gin house a foot or two above the roof of the shed. Mr.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Stoudenmeier v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  4. Bales v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Smarr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Sullivan v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Industrial Tile, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Catholic Diocese of Natchez-Jackson v. JaquithMississippi Supreme Court · 1969

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API