Legal Opinion
Mobile & O. R. Co. v. Watson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 9, 1930No. 6 Div. 634PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■ FOSTER, J.
It has been often repeated by this court that, in a complaint for personal injuries, it 'is not necessary to describe in detail all the characteristics and consequences of the injuries with extreme partidularity. Mobile L. & R. Co. v. Therrell, 205 Ala. 553, 88 So. 677; Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Watson, 215 Ala. 254, 110 So. 316; City Delivery Co. v. Henry, 139 Ala. 161, 34 So. 389.
The allegations of the complaint as to lost time are not unlike such allegations usually made under those circumstances, Gray v. Cooper, 216 Ala. 684, 114 So. 139, and lost time is recoverable in this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Felton v. SpiroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- City Delivery Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- International Agri. Cor. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Norris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Austin v. Tennessee Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Gast v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.