Legal Opinion

Napoleon v. Jersey City Coal & Ice Co.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided December 3, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

❖ * # # # * *

I do find and determine from the evidence taken in this cause as follows:

1. That the petitioner was on the 24th day of March, 1928, in the employ of the respondent in the capacity of coal carrier.

2. That at the time of the injury the said Matthew Napoleon received as wages in said employment, the sum of thirty-eight ($38) dollars per week.

3. That on the 24th day of March, 1928, the said Matthew Napoleon, while in the course of his employment, and engaged in the work of carrying coal for respondent, injured his left foot on a nail which caused serious infection of the left foot,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vishney v. Empire Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  2. Nitram Co. v. Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  3. Purcell v. International Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colbert v. Consolidated LaundryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Drexl v. Jurgensen, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1941
  3. Bisonic v. Halsey Packard, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API