Purcell v. International Motor Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following memorandum ivas filed by Mr. Justice Bergen: “The defendant in certiorari was injured October 21st, 1915, while in the service of the prosecutor, by an accident which it is not questioned arose out of and in the course of his employment.
Read the full summary
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following memorandum ivas filed by Mr. Justice Bergen: “The defendant in certiorari was injured October 21st, 1915, while in the service of the prosecutor, by an accident which it is not questioned arose out of and in the course of his employment. The proofs warrant an inference that prior to the accident the defendant was serving as a machinist, per-, forming such work as his foreman might direct, at a weekly wage of $.18.48, and that after the accident he was continued in the sendee of the prosecutor as night watchman at one-half of his…
1Per curiam
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for ’the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Suggs v. Ternstedt Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
- McKenzie v. Gulf Hills Hotel, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Martinuzzi v. Capitol Marble & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951
- Napoleon v. Jersey City Coal & Ice Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1935
- Glass v. Kieckhefer Container Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1946