Legal Opinion

Drexl v. Jurgensen

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided October 31, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*644The "undisputed facts in this case are substantially as follows : The petitioner was regularly employed by the respondent as a laborer'; that he received for his said services weekly wages of $20; that on March 25th, 1938, he suffered injuries to his right leg as the result of an accident; that the said accident arose out of and in the course of his employment and consisted of a large rock or boulder slipping and rolling upon ■petitioner’s right leg, while he and a fellow worker were trying” to move-it from a lot in Wyckoff, New Jersey, prior to the beginning of building operations thereon;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Frank J. Beltramo, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  2. DeMarco v. F. H. McGraw Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Cirillo v. United Engineers & Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Napoleon v. Jersey City Coal & Ice Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wilkins v. Blanchard-McDonald Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  3. Colbert v. Consolidated LaundryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. Dunlap v. STATE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COM'RWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Outland v. Monmouth-Ocean Educ. Service Com'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API