Legal Opinion

Scott v. AZL Resources, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1988No. 17130PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

Defendants-appellants, AZL Resources, Inc. (AZL), Angel Fire Corporation (Angel Fire), Breckenridge Nordic Village Corporation (Breckenridge), and Baca Grande Corporation (Baca Grande) appeal from the judgment of the district court finding a breach of the employment agreement and each defendant jointly and severally liable under the theory of piercing the corporate veil. After the notice of appeal was filed, however, Baca Grande settled with plaintiff-appellee James A. Scott (Scott) and it is no longer a party therein. We reverse.

On October 1, 1979, Scott entered into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Getz v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of USNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Cruttenden v. ManturaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Harlow v. Fibron Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Ize Nantan Bagowa, Ltd. v. ScaliaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Scott Graphics, Inc. v. MahaneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Smith v. FDC Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sonntag v. ShawNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Garcia v. CoffmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Jemez Agency, Inc. v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
  5. H-B-S Partnership v. Aircoa Hospitality Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API