Legal Opinion
Ize Nantan Bagowa, Ltd. v. Scalia
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 24, 1978No. 2 CA-CIV 2543PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
The sole issue here is whether the trial court erred in “piercing the corporate veil” and imposing personal liability on appellant Baker.
The record shows that Dr. Baker, a medical doctor, formed a professional corporation pursuant to A.R.S. § 10-901 et seq. The corporation, Ize Nantan Bagowa, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as INB, was issued a certificate of incorporation on October 18, 1972. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 10-908 the articles of incorporation provided that the private property of the shareholders was exempt from liability for corporate debts except those set forth…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Dietel v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- North Arlington Medical Building Inc. v. Sanchez Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Irving I. Bass, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Zipco, Inc., a Corporation, Bankrupt v. Robert H. ShutanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Glens Falls InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
3Cited by20 opinions
- ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Scott v. AZL Resources, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Village Press, Inc. v. Stephen Edward Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.