Legal Opinion

Jemez Agency, Inc. v. Cigna Corp.

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided October 12, 1994No. Civ. 93-1011 JB, 93-0397 JBPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BURCIAGA, Chief Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant CIGNA Corporation’s September 13, 1993 motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Court, having reviewed the record, the submissions of the parties and the relevant law, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds Defendant’s motion to dismiss is well taken and is granted.

The dispute in this case centers on a full-service exclusive agency program that subsidiary corporations of Defendant CIGNA Corporation (“CIGNA”) established. Pursuant to this marketing program, known…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Greenview Hospital, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Alexander v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  3. Alto Eldorado Partnership v. Amrep Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Lloyd Design Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  5. Resource Associates Grant Writing & Evaluation Services, Inc. v. Southampton Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API