Jemez Agency, Inc. v. Cigna Corp.
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BURCIAGA, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant CIGNA Corporation’s September 13, 1993 motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Court, having reviewed the record, the submissions of the parties and the relevant law, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds Defendant’s motion to dismiss is well taken and is granted.
The dispute in this case centers on a full-service exclusive agency program that subsidiary corporations of Defendant CIGNA Corporation (“CIGNA”) established. Pursuant to this marketing program, known…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gordon v. Greenview Hospital, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Alexander v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Alto Eldorado Partnership v. Amrep Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Ford Motor Co. v. Lloyd Design Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Resource Associates Grant Writing & Evaluation Services, Inc. v. Southampton Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.