Legal Opinion

Lovell v. Musselman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1914No. 11945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered October 9, 1913, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

— -This is a suit upon a promissory note. There was a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

The facts are these: On the 16th day of September, 1908, the appellant made and delivered his promissory note to the respondent for $250, payable one year after date, without grace, for value received. On the same day, the appellant executed to the respondent a mortgage, which recites that it is executed “for and in consideration of said attorney to defeat decree of divorce.” It further recites that it is given to secure the payment of $350, with interest, according to the terms and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Bell v. EngvolsenWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tassel v. McGrailWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lumbermen's Trust Co. v. Title Ins. & Inv. Co. of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  3. Johnson v. Atlantic & Pacific Fisheries Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Smith v. KerrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  5. Wilson v. KirchanWashington Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API