Legal Opinion

Lumbermen's Trust Co. v. Title Ins. & Inv. Co. of Tacoma

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1918No. 3013PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Washington; Edward E. Cushman, Judge. Bill by the Lumbermen's Trust Company, as trustee, against the Title Insurance & Investment Company of Tacoma, a corporation, and others. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Washington; Edward E. Cushman, Judge. Bill by the Lumbermen's Trust Company, as trustee, against the Title Insurance & Investment Company of Tacoma, a corporation, and others. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals. In the year 1909 there were three incorporated companies engaged in the business of furnishing abstracts of title at Tacoma, Wash.: The .Commonwealth Title Trust Company* hereinafter called the Commonwealth Company, owned and controlled By the Foggs and Gove; the Title Insurance &…

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). [1] We turn first to the question whether the original sale of the Washington Company to the Tacoma Company and the contemporaneous lease of the Wilson Company created a monopoly in the vendee and the lessee within the prohibition of the Constitution of Washington. The Commonwealth Company was the first corporation to engage in the abstract of title business in Pierce county-. Bor a time it had a monopoly of that business, so far as such a business could be monopolized; but, of course, the monopoly cannot be said to have been unlawful. On December 6, 1909,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Cincinnati, Portsmouth, Big Sandy and Pomeroy Packet Co. v. BaySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Pierce v. Somerset RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1898

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State of California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. TexacoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hedrick v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Jennings v. Shepherd Laundries Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. Washington-Idaho Water, Light & Power Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1924
  5. In re John B. Rose Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API