Legal Opinion

Bell v. Engvolsen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1911No. 9388PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clallam county, Still, J., entered June 15, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

This is an appeal from a decree foreclosing a mortgage given to secure a promissory note, whereby appellants promised to pay to respondent, three years after date, $3,100, “with interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum until paid.” It is provided in the mortgage:

“This conveyance is intended as a mortgage to secure the payment of three thousand one hundred dollars, gold coin of the United States, together with interest thereon in like gold coin at the rate of ten per cent per annum from date until paid, payable semi-annually, according to the terms and conditions of one certain…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brownlee v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Muzzy v. KnightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Meyer v. GraeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Seieroe v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Dobbins v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. KirchanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Lovell v. MusselmanWashington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API