Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1997No. C960056MC; CA A94370PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, an allegedly mentally ill person, appeals from a judgment of involuntary civil commitment. ORS 426.130(l)(b)(C). We reverse and remand.

The state concedes that the trial court’s failure to explain to appellant his right to subpoena witnesses under ORS 426.100(1)1 constitutes reversible error. State v. Grellert, 144 Or App 201, 203, 925 P2d 161 (1996); see generally State v. Allison, 129 Or App 47, 877 P2d 660 (1994), and that the failure to preserve the error is not fatal because the error is apparent on the face of the record. State v. Tardanico, 132 Or App 230, 231, 888 P2d 15…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. TardanicoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. TardanicoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. State v. GrellertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. S. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. RussCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. SJFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API