Legal Opinion

State v. Russ

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 7, 1999No. 984950; CA A103960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, an allegedly mentally ill person, appeals from a judgment involuntarily committing him to the Mental Health and Developmental Disability Services Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. We reverse.

While appellant does not assign as error the trial court’s failure to advise him of his rights under ORS 426.100, the state nonetheless acknowledges that the court failed to properly explain to appellant his right to subpoena witnesses. ORS 426.100(l)(d). We have previously held that the failure to advise an allegedly mentally ill person of that person’s right to subpoena witnesses…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. S. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. SJFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API