Legal Opinion

State v. Tardanico

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 28, 1994No. 9402-95325 CA A83206PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

888 P.2d 15 (1994)

132 Or.App. 230

In the Matter of Charlene Tardanico, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Charlene TARDANICO, Appellant.

9402-95325; CA A83206.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted December 9, 1994.

Decided December 28, 1994.

Paul L. Breed argued the cause and filed the brief, Portland, for appellant.

Stephen L. Madkour, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

2Per curiam

In this mental commitment…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. TardanicoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. RitzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. S. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. M. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. MTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. K. J. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API