Legal Opinion
Mrs. Jewell Schenebeck and Russell Schenebeck v. Sterling Drug, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1970No. 19576_1PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Jewell Schenebeck sustained blindness from taking the prescription drug Aralen over a five-year period. She and her husband brought an action for damages against the manufacturer, Sterling Drug, Inc. (Sterling). An Arkansas district court jury awarded her $40,000.00, and her husband an additional $10,000.00 for consequential loss, based on defendant’s negligence. Following the verdict, Sterling moved for judgment n. o. v. The trial court denied the motion for reasons stated in a memorandum opinion reported in 291 F.Supp. 368 (E.D.Ark.1968). Sterling appeals…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Lydia Basko v. Sterling Drug, Inc., and Winthrop LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Maxine F. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Irene M. YarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.