Legal Opinion

State Board of Undertakers v. Joseph T. Sekula Funeral Homes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1940No. Appeal, 3PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

The State Board of Undertakers, of its own motion, issued citations to Benjamin J. Knight, William Di. Harmon and the Joseph T. Sekula Funeral Homes, Inc., to show cause why their respective licenses to engage in the business of undertaking should not be revoked. The respondent corporation is the only one concerned in this appeal. It was alleged that all of its officers were not actively engaged in the conduct of its business, as required by Section 13 of the Act of June 10,1931, P. L. 485. After two hearings, the Board made findings of fact sustaining this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lansdowne Borough Board of Adjustment's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Rimer's Contested Election. Geary's App'l.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. State Board of Undertakers v. FrankenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Pennsylvania Commercial Drivers Conference v. Pennsylvania Milk Control CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Seitz Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Arsenal Board of Trade v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API