Legal Opinion

State Board of Undertakers v. Frankenfield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1937No. Appeals, 26-31 and 33PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

These seven appeals were argued at the same time, and may be disposed of in one opinion. They are proceedings begun by citations issued by the State Board of Undertakers, to the various individuals and corporations named as respondents, to show cause why their licenses and registrations as undertakers should not be suspended or revoked for alleged violations of the provisions of the Act of June 10, 1931, P. L. 485, as amended, regulating the business or profession of undertaking in the Commonwealth.

Since 1895 the business mentioned has been a subject of statutory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Rimer's Contested Election. Geary's App'l.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Twenty-First Senatorial District NominationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. White Township School Directors AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Rule v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. First Baptist Ch. of Pbgh. v. Pbgh.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. McGettigan's Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. State Board of Undertakers v. Joseph T. Sekula Funeral Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Newport Township School District v. State Tax Equalization BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API