Legal Opinion

Grime v. Department of Public Instruction

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1936No. Appeal, 1PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

Appellants, undertakers in the City of Pittsburgh, licensed prior to the passage of the Act of June 10, 1931, P. L. 485, applied for a branch license to the State Board of Undertakers, which held that the Act of 1931 prohibited its issuance, and denied the request. An appeal was talien to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County and the action of the Board was affirmed.

Appellees moved to quash the present appeal, asserting it is barred by the Act. Section 10 gives any applicant or licensee, for thirty days after his license has been refused, suspended or…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Logan v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Teachers' Tenure Act CasesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Zerbe Township School District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Board of Finance & Revenue of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API