Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Commercial Drivers Conference v. Pennsylvania Milk Control Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1948No. Appeal, 17PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

In appellants’ Statement of Questions Involved, three questions are stated for review: (1) May the court below decide that appellants are not persons aggrieved when the Milk Control Commission joined with appellants in stipulating that they were aggrieved? (2) May the court below decide that appellants are not aggrieved by an order which “limits the days when milk can be delivered by dealers employing members of the” appellant labor unions? (3) Is the order limiting delivery days “an unconstitutional exercise of the power delegated to the Commission”?

During the war…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Lansdowne Borough Board of Adjustment's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Rohrer v. Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Knowles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Colteryahn Sanitary Dairy v. Milk Control CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Keystone Raceway Corp. v. State Harness Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Delaware County National Bank v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Louden Hill Farm, Inc. v. Milk Control CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Colozzi v. Bevko, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Cablevision—Division of Sammons Communications, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API