Legal Opinion

Becker v. Olkon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1929No. 27,016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action to cancel two promissory notes and two mortgages securing the same as void for usury. Findings were made in plaintiff’s favor. Defendant appeals from the order denying a new trial.

Plaintiff’s brother, John A. Becker, held a registered title to the three contiguous lots 13, 14 and 15, block 1, of G. Y. Bacon’s subdivision in the city of St. Paul. While such owner and on December 3, 1925, John gave a mortgage on lots 13 and 14 to secure his promissory note for $500. The mortgagee assigned the mortgage to defendant. On February 8, 1926, John, then owner of lot 15, gave a deed thereof to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burnhisel v. FirmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Patterson v. . BirdsallNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Avery v. CreighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Barrows v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whisler v. FindeisenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API