Whisler v. Findeisen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment. It is contended that because there existed a genuine issue as to material facts the trial court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiffs, Carl O. and Carry C. Whisler, signed a note in the sum of $19,000, payable to defendant, H. S. Findeisen, and secured by a real estate mortgage. The note was payable one year after the date of its execution, October 23, 1961, and bore interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum. A memorandum of an agreement, entered into between the parties on October 21, 1961, provided…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Rakness v. Swift and CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Temple v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- I. J. Bartlett Co. v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Becker v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Schmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Lowry Hill Properties, Inc. v. Ashbach Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Hamilton v. Independent School District No. 114Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- City of Coon Rapids v. Suburban Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.