Lauer v. Banning
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Pollc District Court. — Hon. James A. Howe, Judge. Action for breach of promise of marriage. Defendant filed a general denial and other defenses and pleas in mitigation, which so far us material will be noticed in the body of the opinion. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
This is the second time the case has been before us. The opinion on the first appeal -will be found in 110 Iowa, 319. The issues were the same on the second trial as on .the first, save that defendant set out the contract copied in the former opinion as a complete defense to plaintiff’s action. The testimony is not exactly the same as on the former trial, plaintiff having modified some of her statements in order to prove the alleged seduction a little more clearly, and to show that the promise of marriage was after the making of the contract just referred to. *101Practically each and all of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnston v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Holloway v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Dent v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
- McKinsey v. SquiresWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Rime v. RaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Johnson v. KinneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- State v. CottonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Howard v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.