Legal Opinion

Rime v. Rater

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1899PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal fr.om Davis District Court. — Hour. T. M. Fee, Judge. AotioN for breach of promise of marriage. Trial’ to a jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.-

1Opinion of the Court

■ Deekeb, J.

This action was commenced on the 16th day of February, 1897, and the petition alleges a promise to marry, some time during the year, but before the winter of 1894, a breach thereof, and a refusal of the defendant to comply with his promise. Defendant demurred to the petition on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. This demurrer was overruled and exceptions duly taken. Thereupon defendant filed an answer denying the allegations of the petition, pleading the statute of limitations, and further alleging that for a long time plaintiff has been…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Holloway v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Pelamourges v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  3. Chellis v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Reed v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Geiger v. PayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dyer v. LalorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  2. Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Vierling v. BinderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Lauer v. BanningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Herriman v. LaymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API