Howard v. Porter

— In pláintiff’s suit for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile collision, the jury returned a verdict for the defendants, the owner and operator of the truck that collided with plaintiff’s car. No detailed statement of the facts of the accident is necessary for the appeal presents the question as to whether it is proper for counsel, in argument to the-jury; to comment on the exercise by the opposing party of his right not to have his physician testify as to privileged matters and also whether or not 'the comment made in this ease resulted in prejudicial error.

I. The Iowa…