Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Ditzler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 22, 1941No. Gen. No. 41,421PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Hebel

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a complaint in equity filed by Mary S. Bingham, wife of Carl Bingham, against the defendants, Millard F. Bingham, Jr., H. L. Ditzler, H. A. Bresemann and the Chicago Roller Company, an Illinois corporation, praying for an accounting for certain moneys alleged to have been converted by Ditzler and Bresemann acting in collaboration with Millard F. Bingham, Jr., while Ditzler. was president and Bingham, Jr., and Bresemann and the plaintiff were directors of the corporation. The sums involved represented bonuses paid to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Dixmoor Golf Club Inc. v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Farwell v. Pyle-National Electric Headlight Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Gilman, Clinton & Springfield Railroad v. KellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. City of Chicago v. CameronIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  2. Knox Glass Bottle Co. v. UnderwoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Conway v. ConnersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Duncan v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  5. Bingham v. DitzlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API