Duncan v. National Tea Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE ROBSON
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition to intervene in a stockholder’s derivative suit. The question presented is whether or not the petitioners are entitled to intervene as a matter of right under Section 26.1 of the Civil Practice Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1955, chap. 110.)
The record reveals that on February 18, 1952, Adelaide Y. Duncan, a stockholder in the National Tea Company, as trustee of the testamentary trust of her late husband, filed a complaint on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, asserting the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Babcock v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Dimpfell v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Zokoych v. SpaldingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Moore v. McDanielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- WESTON v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Schnitzer v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.