Legal Opinion

Duncan v. National Tea Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 4, 1957No. Gen. 47,025PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE ROBSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition to intervene in a stockholder’s derivative suit. The question presented is whether or not the petitioners are entitled to intervene as a matter of right under Section 26.1 of the Civil Practice Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1955, chap. 110.)

The record reveals that on February 18, 1952, Adelaide Y. Duncan, a stockholder in the National Tea Company, as trustee of the testamentary trust of her late husband, filed a complaint on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, asserting the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Babcock v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Dimpfell v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Zokoych v. SpaldingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Moore v. McDanielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. WESTON v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Schnitzer v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API