Legal Opinion

Warren v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1917PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Greene County Circuit Court. — Ron. Arch A. Johnson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

It is practically agreed that plaintiff was injured by an electric shock in attemting to use *551one of defendant’s telephones; and so a jury found. The defendant appeals from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor.

The plaintiff’s petition, which is assailed as being insufficient, alleges that defendant owned, controlled and operated a telephone system in Springfield, Missouri; that same was operated by the use of wires, receivers, transmitters and electricity; that plaintiff was in the employ of one White, for whose use in his butcher shop defendant had installed one of its telephones; that it was the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Price v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Alabama City G. & A. Ry. Co. v. AppletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Griffith v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  5. Kelly v. City of HigginsvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. DunmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Sutcliffe v. Fort Dodge Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Coaster Amusement Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. McDowell v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. NobletteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API