Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Noblette

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 14, 1938No. [No. 53, April Term, 1938.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

The appeal is from a judgment on the verdict of the jury in favor of William B. Noblette, plaintiff, and against The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Baltimore City, defendant, for the alleged negligence of the defendant in the burning of the grist mill of the plaintiff. The negligence charged is a failure to keep the ground wire of a telephone installation in repair. It is asserted that this default was the cause of the mill being struck and set on fire by lightning during a thunderstorm.

The frame mill of two and one-half stories was in the form of a rectangle whose dimensions…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Slacum v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Strasburger v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  3. Moore v. American Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Epperson v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  5. Shafer v. State Ex Rel. SundergillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bohlen v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Goslee Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. McFarlandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Arshack v. Carl M. Freeman Associates Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Arena Co. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API