Legal Opinion

McDowell v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1976No. 37079PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Plaintiff-respondent brought a negligence action against defendant-appellant Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. to recover damages for injuries sustained while plaintiff was using a telephone installed in his residence by the defendant. Plaintiff alleged that his injury was caused by a severe acoustical trauma brought about by a loud noise. The case was submitted to the jury on a res ipsa loquitur theory, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $10,000.

On appeal, the defendant raises the following points: 1) error was committed in allowing plaintiff to introduce and…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Boten v. BreckleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Bartleman v. HumphreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Maybach v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Yoos v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Dunn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. Koehler v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Fallert Tool & Engineering Co. v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Weaks v. RuppMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API