Legal Opinion

Toner v. Nationwide Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1992No. 554PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on August 13, 1991, granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of appel*619lee, Nationwide Insurance Company and against appellant, Arvilla M. Toner. Appellant’s sole claim on appeal is that the three (3) year limit of liability for medical expenses provided by 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1715(a)(5) should be stricken because it conflicts with the stated purpose of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL). For the following reasons, we affirm.

Appellant, Arvilla M. Toner, sustained injuries as a result of an automobile accident occurring…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vogel v. BerkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Keystone Automated Equipment Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Chesler v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bykowski v. Chesed, Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Estate of Carvalho v. Kasak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2004
  3. Givelify, LLC v. Dept. of Banking and SecuritiesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. PIERCHALSKI v. FARMERS INSURANCE GROUPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API