Legal Opinion

S & M Paving, Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 12, 1982No. 81-5929 TJH, 81-4910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATTER, District Judge:

I

BACKGROUND

This action concerns the validity of the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendment Act of 1980 (MPPAA) (29 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq.). That Act amended the Employee Retirement Income Act of 1974, commonly known as ERISA.

Prior to ERISA, numerous private pension plans had experienced difficulty providing promised retirement benefits for their employees. In 1974, Congress attempted to rectify this problem by creating a multiemployer pension plan system under ERISA. ERISA provided for minimum vesting and funding schedules and established a centrally administered…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shelter Framing Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Dorn's Transportation, Inc. v. I.A.M. National Pension FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  3. Shelter Framing Corp. v. Carpenters Pension TrustDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1982
  4. Pacific Iron & Metal Co. v. Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust FundDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1982
  5. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union-Industry Pension Fund v. G. Bartusch Packing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API