Legal Opinion
Dorn's Transportation, Inc. v. I.A.M. National Pension Fund
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 19, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-1141PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
The case now before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment presents another of the proliferate constitutional challenges to the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA” or “the Act”), Pub.L. No. 96-364, 94 Stat. 1208 (1980), codified at 29 U.S.C. § 1001a et seq. (Supp. V 1981).
By complaint filed April 26, 1982, plaintiffs Dorn’s Transportation, Inc. (“Dorn’s”) and Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. (“Oneida”) contest the validity of the MPPAA under the Due Process and Taking clauses of the Fifth Amendment, and…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keith Fulton & Sons, Inc. v. New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Bowers v. Transportes Navieros EcuadorianosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Robbins v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Connors v. Brady-Cline Coal Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.