Legal Opinion

Haley v. Wyte

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1934No. 23293PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a -case brought by C. R. Haley, as plaintiff, against Jim Wyte, contractor, to recover the sum of $72 for labor performed in erecting improvements on lot 075, block 51, Tulsa Heights addition to the city of Tulsa, Okla., and against E. J. Dean, owner of the land, Erank Motley, who had a contract for its purchase, and H. E. Ketcham, who had filed a lien thereon, and who it was claimed was the equitable owner. Ed Haley, Edmond Smith, and O. A. Copple were also made parties because of liens, filed. The defendants Ed Haley, Edmond Smith, O. A. Copple, and H. E. Ketcham filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Temple v. DuggerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Kingkade v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Niles v. Citizens Nat. Bank of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Bilby v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Yeoman v. ShaefferIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Beck v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Universal Life Insurance v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Hunter v. PepisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Jones v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API