Motorola, Inc. v. Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION * AND ORDER
COPPLE, District Judge.
This case proceeded to trial on plaintiff’s fifty-five page (plus attachments) Amended Complaint filed May 29, 1969. The original complaint was filed August 27, 1968. In the caption the Amended Complaint was entitled:
“Complaint for:
Unfair Competition;
Interference with Advantageous Personnel Relationships;
Antitrust Violation;
Unjust Enrichment;
Constructive Trust upon Benefits Wrongfully Obtained;
Damages — Punitive and Compensatory;
Breach of Fiduciary Duty by Officer and Director.”
During the eight weeks consumed by plaintiff in presenting its…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Engineered Mechanical Services, Inc. v. LangloisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Security Title Agency, Inc. v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Sidney Salomon, Jr. v. Crown Life Insurance Company, Crown Life Insurance Company v. Sidney Salomon, Jr. & Associates, Inc., Sidney Salomon, Jr. v. Crown Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- USM Corp. v. Marson Fastener Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.