State v. Bengston
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
— Appellant was convicted of the crime of abortion and was sentenced to serve six months in the county jail.
But two errors are assigned, namely: The overruling of a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, and the overruling of a motion for a new trial.
No good purpose would be served by setting out and analyzing the facts as shown by the testimony. It is sufficient to say that, after a careful consideration of the whole statement of facts, we are convinced that there was ample evidence to carry the case to the jury.
The second question, in addition to the sufficiency of the evidence, also…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Floe v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Coffer v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. DinasWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Anderson v. BauerWashington Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JackmanWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MesarosWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. LetellierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- State v. PopeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. JackmanWashington Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.