Legal Opinion

State v. Jackman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1989No. 55836-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

113 Wn.2d 772 (1989)

783 P.2d 580

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v.

WILFRED POPE JACKMAN, Petitioner.

No. 55836-1.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 14, 1989.

Appelwick, Trickey, Sluiter & Spicer and Michael J. Trickey, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donna L. Wise, Senior Appellate Attorney, for respondent.

DURHAM, J.

After a jury convicted Wilfred Pope Jackman of first degree robbery, the trial court ordered a new trial, citing jury misconduct, newly discovered evidence and a misstatement of fact by the prosecutor during closing argument. The Court of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API