State v. Jackman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
113 Wn.2d 772 (1989)
783 P.2d 580
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
WILFRED POPE JACKMAN, Petitioner.
No. 55836-1.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
December 14, 1989.
Appelwick, Trickey, Sluiter & Spicer and Michael J. Trickey, for petitioner.
Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donna L. Wise, Senior Appellate Attorney, for respondent.
DURHAM, J.
After a jury convicted Wilfred Pope Jackman of first degree robbery, the trial court ordered a new trial, citing jury misconduct, newly discovered evidence and a misstatement of fact by the prosecutor during closing argument. The Court of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.