Legal Opinion
Puricelli v. CNA Insurance
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided April 14, 1999No. Civ. No. 98-CV-0359PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs, Diane Puricelli and Charles Hughes, jointly filed suit against their former employer, defendant CNA, seeking relief for alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), the New York State Human Rights Law, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendant now moves this court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 20(a) and 21 to sever the claims of plaintiffs Puricelli and Hughes on the ground that the claims are misjoined because they neither arise out of the same transaction or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Blesedell v. Mobil Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Grayson v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
- Henderson v. AT & T CORP.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Montgomery v. STG International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Roe v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Costello v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Wynn v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Disparte v. Corporate Executive BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.