Legal Opinion

Lucey v. Dedman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1929No. 9298PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

While no written opinion is required of this court in this cause, in deference to the able work of counsel for both sides, the grounds of its judgment will be thus briefly outlined:

Appellant sued the appellee for $750 damages to four oil well drums, which he alleged he had delivered to him, “with instructions that the same be repaired, said repairs to consist of the cutting down and smoothing of the surface or outer lining on the brake flange so as to remove all unnecessary roughness and to true up the brake surface or outer lining so as to insure a better fitting and working .of the brakes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evansich v. G., C. & Santa Fe R. R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Wentworth v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Wisconsin Red Pressed-Brick Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Skalsky v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. BoysenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Sands Motel v. HargraveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Houston Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Seinsheimer v. BurkhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API