Legal Opinion
Dunnivant v. Bi-State Auto Parts
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 15, 1988No. 87-7652PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
In this Sherman Act antitrust case, we apply the teachings of Helicopter Support Systems v. Hughes Helicopter, 818 F.2d 1530 (11th Cir.1987) to affirm the district court’s ruling that no violation of the Sherman Act occurred as a result of the proof developed in this case.
FACTS
In October, 1982, Sam Dunnivant, the appellant, opened an automotive parts store (Sammy’s Auto Parts) in Ardmore, Alabama, and continued operation until March, 1985. Three other automotive re*1578tail businesses were also located in Ard-more: Ardmore Parts, Inc. (Spence), Bi-State Auto Parts, and the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Delong Equipment Company v. Washington Mills Abrasive CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- International Logistics Group, Ltd. Aargus Truck and Automotive Supply, Inc. Guardian Auto Supply, Inc. v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Market Force Inc. v. Wauwatosa Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.