Legal Opinion
Delong Equipment Company v. Washington Mills Abrasive Company
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 13, 1989No. 88-8664PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant DeLong Equipment Company (“DeLong”) brought this action against Washington Mills Abrasive Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary Washington Mills Ceramic Corporation (collectively referred to as “Washington Mills” unless otherwise noted), B.C.S. Company, Inc. (“BCS”), and several individuals alleging violations of the federal antitrust laws as well as pendent state law claims. The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the defendants, and De-Long appeals. Because we find that De-Long has raised genuine issues of material fact…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. ZweifelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Todorov v. DCH Healthcare AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Seagood Trading Corp. v. Jerrico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.