Kirsch v. Kirsch
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of-the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Action for divorce; judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment upon the judgment roll alone.
The ground of divorce set up in the complaint was extreme cruelty. Defendant filed an “answer and cross-complaint,” in which he denied the alleged acts of cruelty, and set up affirmatively extreme cruelty by plaintiff, and prayed for a divorce on the latter ground. Plaintiff answered the cross-complaint, denying its averments as to cruelty. The amended complaint was filed September 26, 1886. Afterward, on January 10, 1887, defendant, “ by consent of plaintiff, and by leave of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spiers v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- De La Guerra v. NewhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Mahoney v. CapertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Hiatt v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kirsch v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Westphal v. ArnouxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Porter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Reynolds v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ennor v. RaineNevada Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.